data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/040e7/040e7c113d5c66c58a658d68637d0d99883b67d3" alt=""
Well, I don’t really get four months “off” in the summer, but it was a pleasure to say nonetheless. But to be fair: my dinner companion never attended university (and not much of high school for that matter) and so he doesn’t really have any conception of what my job entails. His comment was really aimed at “teachers” generally – the kind he knew and loathed as a teenager, those autocratic bastards who expected him to do things like read books and learn French and solve math problems. And, boy, did he ever show them, because he did none of those things.
For years now I’ve put up with this sort of thing in all manner of social settings. And it’s remarkable how often the people who attack our teachers demonstrate that they what they really needed at a younger age was to have paid more attention in school. The first sign you’re dealing with ignoramuses is that they mouth off about things they know nothing about. So it felt good to finally push back a little, and I took a certain pride in saying aloud to all assembled that if they were so concerned about teachers getting their summers off they should write to their MP’s and demand that their kids spend the summer in school, too. You can imagine how that went over. “But that would ruin our vacations!”
Check and mate, I think. The obvious counter-move, though, was for someone to say that the real solution is to pay teachers less, and somebody did raise this point. Again, they want the best education for their children, but not if they have to pay for it.
Well, there’s no way around this. They’re going to have to pay for it, and they’re going to have to pay more, in fact. If parents want to attract qualified people to the field of teaching they’re going to have to make it worth their while, and in a serious way. And if the Ontario government wants to keep insisting that it wants more students to go to university, it’s going to have to compensate the professoriate for the extra seven or eight years they spent, out of the workforce, getting their PhDs, and for the very real gamble they took in choosing to pursue that career path.
And it’s for this reason that I add my very small voice in support of my colleagues at the University of Western Ontario, main campus, who might go on strike this week. The fact that they already get paid more, on average, than most other people, isn’t the issue. The issue is that they deserve to, and that teachers generally deserve to, because there few things are more important than how we educate our young.
2 comments:
This early update brought to you in the spirit of solidarity.
This is indeed a very interesting topic and one that comes up not only for teachers but in my field as well which is far removed from the world of academia. It seems like it really boils down to a few specific questions. Do we as a society compensate people base on the perceived value of their skills (ie. teaching children is important) or based on the quantity of people who are able/qualified to perform those tasks. Not everyone can be a neurosurgeon for example but there are many people coming out of teachers college who are qualified to teach English. So many that there are not enough jobs for them.
I don't for a second deny that teachers work hard and that most are very devoted to their students and employers. I also understand that for professors those "4 months off" are likely spent conducting research, publishing, etc.
Also I am not convinced that it is an issue of that people "do not want to pay" for qualified teachers or professors I think there is also an issue here of that the guy making $16/hour digging highways simply can't pay for it and there are more of those people than the teachers making $90,000 + / year.
So the question of what someone's labour is worth to society comes down to do we reward education and effort or do we let the free market decide who is worth what?
ooohhh... I can feel the hate coming my way!
Post a Comment