Hi,
I’m offering tennis lessons, at a big tennis facility. They cost $7271.93. I know that sounds like a lot, but, consider the following. The average incoming tennis student, based on prior demonstrated skills in tennis, is awarded a $1,000 admission bursary. This brings the cost of a package down to $6300, on average. For that, you get fifteen hours of tennis lessons per week with at least five established professionals in the field, and it’s a twenty-six week package! That’s 390 hours of tennis lessons for $6300, which works out to $16/hour for instruction!
Still not convinced? Well – and you’re not going to believe this – the cost of your lessons is tax deductible! This reduces the functional cost of your tuition, I mean, tennis lessons, by an average of 15%, or to about $5350, or about about $13.70 hour. I'll say that again – $13.70 an hour! That's about what Laser Tag costs! (You can even take out low-interest loans to cover the cost of your lessons, and the interest you pay on them is tax deductible, reducing the interest rate with inflation to about 1%).
In addition, I forgot to mention the other services we offer. You have free weekly opportunities for one-on-one consultation with your tennis instructors – some of whom are world class tennis champions – in addition to a wide array of free skill-set and personal related counselling by professionals that you can consult without limit. And your tennis instructors almost always can offer tips by e-mail.
Did I mention the tennis library, which has tens of thousands of works about tennis you can check out, staff you can consult with, and where you can work to study up on your game for no additional charge? Or the tennis libraries’ thousands of digital databases you have 24/7 access to in order to improve your playing?
Did I mention our recreational facilities? The gym? The pool? The fitness classes? The dozens of non-tennis related clubs? The vast number of social activities you can go to in order to meet other tennis students? That we even hold concerts and plays and have an art gallery and lovely grounds to walk? Nearly all of these services are available at no extra charge, and they’re available to you when tennis lessons aren’t in session. We even throw in a free year-round bus pass! Finally, we can demonstrate statistically that people who have taken tennis lessons have higher lifetime earnings than people who haven’t.
What’s that? No, I’m afraid we can’t offer tennis lesson for free. All those services cost money. I know it's a difficult concept. But the fact is, we’re literally going bankrupt offering the lessons at their current rates. The way it’s looking right now, we probably won’t be able to offer them for much longer, so I’d grab the lessons now if you could.
One thing, though…some people still complain that their tennis lessons are far too expensive. And yet our records show that they only show up for half their lessons! Maybe they shouldn’t have taken tennis lessons in the first place.
"I think we ought always to entertain our opinions with some measure of doubt. I shouldn't wish people dogmatically to believe any philosophy, not even mine." Bertrand Russell
Showing posts with label satire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label satire. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 17, 2015
Sunday, December 14, 2014
Syllabi
Note: today's column is an actual syllabus that seems to have fallen through a crack between the universes. It comes from what appears to be a parallel dimension where lawyers and people who study pedagogy have not yet destroyed improved the education system. I do not approve, of course, as indicated by my own ten page syllabi that leave absolutely nothing to chance. But my doppleganger in the parallel dimension seems to be somewhat more reckless than me.
History 2000E: History
History 2000E: History
______________
Professor or Dr. Graham Broad. You may also call me Death, Destroyer of Worlds.
Office Hours: When I’m in my office. Note that I am a professional historian. I’ve written books about it. Whole books. And I’ve read books about it. Lots of them. Come to see me. I can probably point you in the right direction.
Office Phone: Phone currently is buried under books.
E-Mail: No.
Course Website: No. There are also no circus acts, no candy floss machines, foot massages, smoothies, or therapy pets.
________________
Course Description:
In this course we will learn about history, including politics, war, religion, families, gender, childhood, ethnicity, migrations, art, literature, philosophy, music, drama, architecture, science, technology, the environment and geography, cuisine, and sports, and their relationship to the present. Some people say that these things have “no value” in the “real world.” Those people are called ‘assholes.’ Avoid them.
Expectations and Outcomes: Oh, for God’s sake. What do you think they are?
Grade Breakdown: Learning: 100%
Required Books: There are a bunch of good books on this topic. Come see me in my office and I’ll recommend some.
Reading List: You give me one. I'll make suggestions.
Description of Assignments: You’ll be required to read history, write about history, and talk about history – intelligently.
Lectures: I will be giving lectures this year, though not that many. Show up or don’t. Whatever. I won’t be telling you entertaining stories about the past or giving you chronology that you easily could learn on your own. I will not be breaking the lecture into ten minute chunks like the pedagogists say, because my goal isn’t to make you dumber. I will not have a scroll of PowerPoint bullets on the screen behind me for you to transcribe because I don’t believe that the designers at Microsoft actually know or care about teaching or learning. I will not be making the same jokes I’ve made for the past five years or five decades, for that matter. I won’t be making learning “fun” at all, actually, because I’m not in the entertainment industry. Trust me when I say that this going to hurt quite a bit.
Policy on Attendance: There isn’t one. You’re allowed to fail. In fact, you don’t have to attend anything in life. If you want, you can lie in bed for weeks on end until you starve or die of dysentery. It's nice to have options.
Late Policy: Punctuality is important, but If you need a bit of extra time to complete your assignments, just consult with me in advance and then do your best to get quality work done. But do not come to my office and lie to me.
Statement on Plagiarism. Ask yourself a question: do I feel lucky?
Statement on the Use of Electronic Devices: History lesson #1: incredible though it may seem, there was a time, long, long ago when it was considered not merely sensible but actually polite to listen to people who are talking to you. So, whatever.
Student Code of Conduct: Don’t be a jerk.
Essay Rubric. Um….seriously? You’ve made it to your fifteenth year of subsidized education and you need to be told what a good essay looks like? Read a book. I can recommend some.
Frequently Asked Questions
I don’t like speaking in front of others, what should I do? One option is to commit a terrible crime and be sentenced to solitary confinement for the rest of your life.
I'm not good at writing. Any tips? Sue your high school teachers. Also, read books.
How will this help me get a job? I dunno. How will your job stop you from being the kind of person who voted for Hitler?
I have anxiety. How can that be accommodated? Outside my office you’ll see a thing that dispenses numbers. Please take one. Then hand one out to everyone on the planet. Make sure to hand them out in refugee camps in the Middle East and Africa especially. Explain to the people in them that you have a lot reading to do. Then invent a time machine, travel back in time to 1939 and then to 1914, and hand them out to everyone your age in university. Remember to tell them that you are under a lot of pressure.
Do you even care? Of course I do. If I didn’t care, I would make things easier for you.
Any final thoughts? Start reading – now. Write clearly and carefully. Consult with me often. In class, pick a side and argue persuasively for it, and then the next day argue for the other side. Change your mind when you’re proven wrong – that’s what it means to be ‘objective.’ Hold yourself and your classmates and your professors to the highest standards. Call them out when they make mistakes. Loathe cliches. Detest pointless bureaucracy. Know when you're being condescended to. Refuse to fill out student evaluations of teaching. Tell the guy playing video games in front of you to close his laptop because it’s distracting everyone. Drink beer and wine long into the night and fight about what you learned that day but be up and ready for class the next morning without fail, every single time. Make friends – and enemies. Go to a play and an art opening and see visiting speakers in other disciplines. Get lost in the library.
Do anything but be boring.
Monday, November 24, 2014
Templates
School sucks, and so it shouldn’t surprise us that the mere mention of teachers or schools in an on-line article brings out a torrent of spittle-spewing rage from the kinds of people who like to spew spittle ragefully and by the torrent on message boards. I’ve written elsewhere about how such people are the worst humanity has to offer and, boy, do they have a lot crabbin’ to do.
Measure of Doubt regards itself as an equal-opportunity public service and therefore has developed the following template for spittle-spewing reactionaries to use on Internet message boards following any article about teachers or schools in the hopes that it might save them time. They can then turn their attention to trolling about firefighters or public art or bicycles or those damn kids who keep getting on their lawn. Here it is:
——————
A Template for Spittle-Spewing Reactionaries to Use on Internet Message Boards Following Any Article About Teachers or Schools, by Measure of Doubt
The problem with education today is (my personal bugaboo here) which they didn't have (insert when you were in school) and also the (overpaid / coddled / lazy / uncaring) (teachers / administrators/ parents) who have (abandoned all standards / given up caring ) and instead embraced (multiculturalism / political correctness / secularism / gay agenda / communism) because all they care about (is /are) (money / sick days / P.D. days) and indoctrinating youth into the ( Liberal Party / union / gay agenda / international communist conspiracy / ISIS ). Whatever happened to (our values / common sense / plain old hard work)? We need to bring back (three R’s / male teachers / basics / corporal punishment / fatal beatings / conscription) because the youth of today are (stupid / lazy / cowardly / fat / communists / atheists / terrorists / gay) who (can’t read / can’t write cursive / only take sex ed / only take square dancing) and this is the reason why we have (global warming hysteria / wind turbines / Kathleen Wynne / bicycle lanes / hip hop) (that/which/who/whom) is leading our (once great / formerly great) country that (our veterans / brave men and women in uniform) (sacrificed / suffered for) to (hell / chaos / anarchy / collapse). I would (call / e-mail / text / visit ) my (child’s teacher / school board head / city councillor / MP / MPP) if I (believed they weren’t part of the problem / knew who they are) and give (him/her/them) (a piece of my mind / something to think about / a knuckle sandwich). Anyone who is disagrees is probably (Kathleen Wynne / a foreigner / a communist / a hip hop artist / a bicycle commuter / gay).
For example:
“The problem with education today is the use of cell phones which they didn’t have in the 1890s when I went to school and also the overpaid teachers who have abandoned all standards and instead embraced multiculturalism because all they care about are sick days and indoctrinating youth into the gay agenda. Whatever happened to common sense? We need to bring back male teachers because the youth of today are communists who can’t write cursive and this is the reason why we have wind turbines that are leading our once great country that our veterans suffered for to hell. I would call my MP if I knew who they were and give them a knuckle sandwich. Anyone who disagrees is probably Kathleen Wynne.”
Measure of Doubt regards itself as an equal-opportunity public service and therefore has developed the following template for spittle-spewing reactionaries to use on Internet message boards following any article about teachers or schools in the hopes that it might save them time. They can then turn their attention to trolling about firefighters or public art or bicycles or those damn kids who keep getting on their lawn. Here it is:
——————
A Template for Spittle-Spewing Reactionaries to Use on Internet Message Boards Following Any Article About Teachers or Schools, by Measure of Doubt
The problem with education today is (my personal bugaboo here) which they didn't have (insert when you were in school) and also the (overpaid / coddled / lazy / uncaring) (teachers / administrators/ parents) who have (abandoned all standards / given up caring ) and instead embraced (multiculturalism / political correctness / secularism / gay agenda / communism) because all they care about (is /are) (money / sick days / P.D. days) and indoctrinating youth into the ( Liberal Party / union / gay agenda / international communist conspiracy / ISIS ). Whatever happened to (our values / common sense / plain old hard work)? We need to bring back (three R’s / male teachers / basics / corporal punishment / fatal beatings / conscription) because the youth of today are (stupid / lazy / cowardly / fat / communists / atheists / terrorists / gay) who (can’t read / can’t write cursive / only take sex ed / only take square dancing) and this is the reason why we have (global warming hysteria / wind turbines / Kathleen Wynne / bicycle lanes / hip hop) (that/which/who/whom) is leading our (once great / formerly great) country that (our veterans / brave men and women in uniform) (sacrificed / suffered for) to (hell / chaos / anarchy / collapse). I would (call / e-mail / text / visit ) my (child’s teacher / school board head / city councillor / MP / MPP) if I (believed they weren’t part of the problem / knew who they are) and give (him/her/them) (a piece of my mind / something to think about / a knuckle sandwich). Anyone who is disagrees is probably (Kathleen Wynne / a foreigner / a communist / a hip hop artist / a bicycle commuter / gay).
For example:
“The problem with education today is the use of cell phones which they didn’t have in the 1890s when I went to school and also the overpaid teachers who have abandoned all standards and instead embraced multiculturalism because all they care about are sick days and indoctrinating youth into the gay agenda. Whatever happened to common sense? We need to bring back male teachers because the youth of today are communists who can’t write cursive and this is the reason why we have wind turbines that are leading our once great country that our veterans suffered for to hell. I would call my MP if I knew who they were and give them a knuckle sandwich. Anyone who disagrees is probably Kathleen Wynne.”
Thursday, November 20, 2014
Addendum
News
this morning that the Legion in Kenora, Ontario, fired its chaplain
because she criticized cuts to veterans' care during her Remembrance Day
benediction. Good for them. The day is supposed to be about the simple
act of remembering, not politics. In fact, next year I expect to
see no politicians laying wreaths at my local cenotaph. Also, they
better not breathe a word about "freedom" and "democracy" either,
because those are political concepts. National anthem? Got to go,
because it mentions "Canada", which is a political construct.
God Save the Queen? Please. Oh, and no poppies, either. According
to the Legion, the money raised from them goes to veteran's care, and
we don't want to bring that up on Remembrance Day. So make sure
your next Remembrance Day bears no relationship to anything in the real
world, especially if it happened in the past. Just do what you're
supposed to, please: stand there and feel guilty because your generation
hasn't had a world war, you bunch of entitled slackers.
Saturday, October 25, 2014
Disengagement
A Parable.
Meet Jane Doe, a second year English and
History major at a mid-sized university in Canada. Jane has just turned
nineteen and is not sure what she wants to do when she graduates, but she’s
thinking of becoming a teacher or maybe a lawyer.
Like nearly every school in the country, Jane’s
university boasts that it offers small classes and excellent teaching, but she
went there because it’s in her home town and her high school average of 78
wasn’t strong enough to gain her entrance to a really first-tier university,
where the entrance averages are now in the mid-to-high 80s.
Jane’s father works for a contracting firm and
her mother is a secretary in a dental office. They had wanted her to major in
business and economics, but at the end of her first year of university Jane’s
overall average was 63 and was just 58 in Economics. She never was any good at
math. This disqualified her from her school’s business program. After first
year, she decided to major in English and History because she finished those
classes with marks of 64 and 66 respectively, good enough to declare them as a
major. Jane’s sixteen-mark drop between
Grade 12 and the end of 1st year university is fairly typical. A few of her
friends from high school dropped out after first year, or were required to
withdraw because they failed most of their courses.
Jane lived at home first year but now rents a
room in a house with three other female students. Her share of the rent is $400
per month, plus one-fifth of the heat and electricity bill. She also pays $35
per month for an Internet connection and $65 per month for the plan for her
iPhone. She owns a used car that she makes payments on, and she also has to
cover the cost of her gas and insurance. Her parents put $2,000 per year
towards her tuition, leaving her with $4000 to pay on her own, plus another
$750 for books. To pay for her education, Jane is taking out student loans and
has two jobs, one at a clothing store in the mall on Saturdays and one evening
per week, and the other, two nights per week or three when she can get it, in a
downtown restaurant. She is looking for volunteer work at local schools to pad
her resume in the hopes of getting into teacher’s college.
It is the Tuesday after the Canadian
Thanksgiving long weekend. Tuesday is Jane’s “heavy” day, with three classes.
She chose her courses that way so that she could have one day per week off to
study, although she usually ends up taking a shift at work instead. At 9:30 AM, Jane arrives for her first class,
Canadian history, five minutes late. She has a coffee and a muffin she bought
for breakfast on her drive in. Prof. Jones always begins class by playing music
from the period they’re studying, so Jane knows she won’t miss anything. She
sits near the back and opens her laptop and puts her iPhone down beside her.
She sends two quick texts and updates her Facebook status.
When the music is done, Prof. Jones says, “I’ll
explain that music to you later.” (He actually forgets to do so.) Prof. Jones
begins the lecture with a few announcements. He reminds them to keep up in the
textbook, because it's testable material for the mid-term, even if he didn't
lecture about it in class. Jane started the year well, but is three weeks
behind in textbook readings now. She bought the book used for half the cover
price. It was in very good condition, with only a little bit of yellow
highlighting in the first chapter.
Prof. Jones also announces that the History Club is bringing in a “very,
very famous” historian to speak the following week. Jane heard from a friend
that one History Club speaker last year was very boring and droned on and on.
She writes down the details of the event — hoping Prof. Jones will see her
doing this — but has no intention of going. (Jane is not alone in this: more than
three hundred students will hear the announcement for the “very, very famous
speaker.” Eighteen will attend the talk.)
Prof. Jones launches into his lecture, which is
about New France. He uses PowerPoint slides and Youtube clips of historical
re-enactments to liven things up. Even
so, Jane finds her attention wandering after about twenty minutes. She is tired
and yawns. She worked late at the restaurant the night before, well past
closing, and wasn’t home until after midnight.
Then she’d tried to work on an assignment which is overdue for her Human
Sexuality course, a critical analysis of an old article by someone named
Durkheim. When Jane opened the article,
she found that it was thirty-seven pages long. It was very boring. She read four
or five pages (this took her twenty minutes: Jane usually checks e-mail,
Facebook, and surfs the web while she’s reading) and she decided that since the
assignment was only worth 5%, it could wait another day.
Jane looks around. There are about thirty
people in the room, which is about half of the number actually enrolled in the
class. A classmate in front of her is watching a replay of a hockey game on his
laptop. He has one earbud in. Another is playing World of Warcraft. Other classmates are on Facebook or are texting.
During the class, Jane herself receives and answers a dozen text messages,
hiding the phone under the long row of tables. A friend from work is
complaining about their boss.
In the very front row, eight rows down from
Jane, a girl shoots her hand up to ask a question. People roll their eyes. Jane
dislikes this girl. She only asks questions to make herself look smart. Prof. Jones answers the question, speaking to
that student alone. Everyone else’s attention begins to fade and chatter starts
to rise in the room. After a couple of minutes Prof. Jones resumes lecturing
after calling everyone to order. A minute later, though, somebody’s cell phone
goes off. “Sorry! Sorry!” a student
cries out. There’s a disruption until she shuts the phone off, its ringtone
clearly recognizable to the class.
Prof. Jones says, “No problem. Hey! I know that
song! It’s “Toxic” by Britney Spears!” He sings a few bars in a broken voice.
This gets a big laugh.
Jane likes Prof. Jones. He is young and full of
energy, seems nice and doesn’t mark too hard. When the course is over, she will
give him excellent teaching evaluation scores.
Just before class ends, forty-five minutes
after it began, Prof. Jones reminds everyone that they have an essay due in two
weeks. “Come to see me in my office,” he says. Someone asks where his office is
and what his hours are. These are on the course syllabus but Jane makes a note
of them anyway and closes her laptop.
Jane has an hour before next class so she heads
for the Learning Commons, a new metal and glass building on campus.
There are big windows, a coffee shop, flat screen TVs showing the news or “The
View”, and plenty of lounge chairs. There are about forty or fifty students
around, either standing in line for coffee or sitting with their laptops or
phones, surfing the web and texting, or talking with friends. A few are
reading. A small group of students is setting up a table. They’re selling
tickets to an AIDs-awareness fashion show.
Jane passes by a bulletin board covered in
notices for campus events, including the famous History Club speaker that Prof. Jones
mentioned before. The title of the talk is "Towards a New Hermeneutics of Discourse Analysis in High Medieval Parish Registers." The Political Science club is planning a trip to see
Parliament in session. There’s a pub crawl next Thursday to raise money for a
student trip to El Salvador. Women’s self-defense classes are being held in the
women’s residence. (In pen somebody has written, “this is sexist” on the
poster.) The Justice program is bringing in a refugee from Syria to talk
about his experience. The Student Writing Centre has drop-in hours on Tuesdays
and Thursdays. Beside this, somebody put up an unauthorized flier for an
Internet service that sells “Example Essays” written by graduate students.
There are auditions for a student performance of Twelfth Night. Someone
is selling textbooks, cheap.
Jane glances at all this without much interest,
then sits and checks her e-mail, her Facebook page, and sends some texts. She
has a reading she has to do for her next class. It’s a poem called “Religio
Laici” by a writer named John Dryden. She flips through it in her Norton
Anthology of English Literature. It’s very long. She puts her feet up and
starts reading. Over the next fifteen minutes, she reads about a quarter of the
poem, which is very boring, highlights a few passages, and sends three text messages and looks at some
pictures from a friend’s party on Facebook, “liking” this and that. Then a guy from her next class sits down
across from her.
“Did
you do the reading?” he asks.
“Most
of it,” Jane says. “It was so long.”
“I
know, I was like, uggh. What the fuck? I didn’t think this class would be so
boring.” He asks her if he can borrow her notes from the last class.
Another classmate shows up, with a coffee and a doughnut. She says that she found a summary of the poem on Wikipedia. They talk for a bit about their other classes and professors. “I heard he’s tough,” Jane’s classmate says about Prof. Jones.
Another classmate shows up, with a coffee and a doughnut. She says that she found a summary of the poem on Wikipedia. They talk for a bit about their other classes and professors. “I heard he’s tough,” Jane’s classmate says about Prof. Jones.
They
talk until class. Jane knows that the instructor, Prof. Gilbert, always covers
the poem anyway and there isn’t much discussion so she doesn’t need to have it
read. Prof. Gilbert is one of the older
professors in the college. He lectures from paper notes without PowerPoint. He
drones on and on and tells jokes that nobody laughs at. A few minutes later,
when they get to the classroom door, they find a note saying that Prof. Gilbert
is away and that class is cancelled.
Jane
looks at the sign indifferently. If she’d known she would have skipped Jones’s
class and slept in until 11. Behind her a student says, “He only does this
because he has tenure and can get away with it.” Jane isn’t sure what ten-year
is but reflects that this student usually doesn’t go to class anyway. (In fact,
Prof. Gilbert had announced he wouldn’t be present the week before, but Jane
and about half the class weren’t there that day, either.)
Maybe
now would be a good time to see Prof. Jones about her essay. It is due the
following Friday but she hasn’t started. She has decided to write something
about women in New France. She heads to Prof. Jones’s office. In the hall,
there are professors milling about. She catches snippets of a heated
conversation. They seem to be complaining about something to do with the
school. When she gets to Prof. Jones’s office, Jane reads the sign next to the
door:
Prof. R. Strong, English
Prof. M. Kuffert, Sociology
Prof. A. Jones, History
Prof. A. Xao, Business and Economics
Dr. D. Bryson, English (on Sabbatical Leave)
Jane knocks. There is no answer. A professor emerges
from the office next door. “Do you know if Prof. Jones is around?” Jane asks her.
The professor doesn’t seem to know who Jones is. Jane explains that he teaches Canadian
history. “Oh!” the professor says. “No, haven’t seen him.”
Jane
sits on an old chair at the end of the hall and starts up her laptop. The professors who were having the heated
conversation up the hall retreat into an office and close the door.
Beside Jane is a bulletin board next to the
office nearest to her. There are quotations and Far Side comics on it, and a
poster for a conference that happened last year. There’s also a recent news
story from the campus paper about Prof. Gilbert being inducted into something
called the Royal Society of Canada. That reminds Jane. She e-mails Prof. Gilbert asking if next week
they’ll be doing this week’s readings, since class was cancelled, or moving on
to next week’s readings. (Gilbert does not reply and Jane will decide for
herself that she doesn’t need to do next week’s reading.)
After
twenty minutes of texting and surfing and waiting for Prof. Jones, Jane goes
back to the Learning Commons, hoping some friends will be there. There aren’t,
so she buys a coffee and cookie for four dollars and then decides to go to the
library, maybe to get in some work on her essay. On the library computers,
students are checking e-mail and Facebook and a few are printing essays. Jane
sits in front of a library computer and logs on. Next to her, a group of three
are gathered around a computer, watching a Youtube video of a dog and laughing.
Jane
rarely goes to the library. In first year, she tried looking a book up but got
intimidated by the rows and rows of shelves and gave up after a few minutes of
trying to find it. She seldom goes looking anymore, relying on Google
Books or her local public library instead. One time, she even went back to her
old high school and got advice for a paper from her favourite high school
teacher. The university library offers regular tours and workshops about using
the library, but Jane has never taken one. She doesn’t ask the library staff
for help because she doesn’t want to seem stupid.
There is something new on the library
webpage now, a search engine that says, “find articles.” Jane spends a few
minutes with this, typing in keywords like “women” and “New France.” She takes the first two articles that appear
at random and prints them off. One of them, she will later be told, is a book
review, but she won’t understand why that can’t be a source.
It
is now nearly noon. Jane has a two hour American history class at 12:30. She
buys a slice of pizza and a Diet Coke for seven dollars and sits with some
friends in the nearest cafeteria, which is named “Rendezvous.” There are flat
screen TV’s showing the news and sports. She talks with her friends about shows
they’ve watched on Netflix and they complain about how many assignments they
have do. One student complains about Prof. Jones. “Why does he talk about stuff
if it’s not going to be on the final exam?” he asks.
At
12:20, Jane heads to her American history class. In her usual spot near the back, two guys in
baseball caps and sweats are sitting and talking hockey. They have almost never
been in class. They smell like tobacco smoke and say “fuck” a lot. Jane sits
away from them, but still at the back. Today there is a student presentation
before the lecture. Jane has to do a presentation in three weeks. She is
supposed to talk to Prof. Merrill about her topic, but hasn’t yet. Since Merrill
hasn’t e-mailed her, Jane thinks that maybe it’s not a big deal. She doesn’t
like doing presentations or participating in discussion because she doesn’t
like speaking in front of other people.
Prof. Merrill distributes a form to all the students. As a way of
ensuring that everyone is paying attention to the presenter, Prof. Merrill asks
everyone to provide a letter grade and some feedback for each presenter.
A
student Jane doesn't know gives a ten-minute presentation on a book called The
Radicalism of the American Revolution. The student begins: “Okay, like,
when I was reading this I was, like, this is so sick because, like...” Nobody is really listening. People are
fooling around on the Internet, texting, or playing games, even though they
have a form to fill out. The two guys at the back are talking in low voices.
Jane's attention wanders. She checks her e-mail and Facebook and sends some texts. When the presentation is over, there is some
applause and Prof. Merrill asks, “Are there any questions?” Nobody moves or says anything. “Any
questions?” she asks again. “Okay, well, I guess you did such a good job that
there are no questions.” Nobody laughs at this. After a second, Prof. Merrill
asks a couple of questions of her own that the student answers in jumbles. When
the questions are over, there is more applause. Jane gives the student an
"A" and writes, "Great job! This was so interesting.” She
sends the handout forward.
Now Merrill begins her own lecture. She announces that the topic of today’s lecture will be the Constitution of 1787. “You have to know this,” she says. “Or nothing else in the course will make sense.” Jane writes that down. As Merrill lectures, a steady scroll of bulleted PowerPoint points summarizing her speaking points goes on behind her. When the course began, Jane took notes, but now she knows that the PowerPoint slides are on the Internet so she doesn’t really bother. Now and then, Merrill says, “And this is important” or “and I want you to know this” and Jane will type it on her laptop. “Sorry, what was that date?” a student asks. “Dates aren’t important - think big picture,” Merrill says. Jane wonders why she mentions dates at all, then. Merrill goes back to lecturing.
By
the thirty minute mark in the lecture, Jane’s eyes begin to droop. She is very,
very sleepy. The remainder of the lecture goes by in a sort of auditory blur.
She snaps back to awareness when Merrill says, “OK, well. I think that’s good enough for today.” She
sounds a bit angry. Jane wonders what’s going on. They have only been in class
for a little over an hour, total. People begin to pack up their bags and head
for the door. Jane thinks that maybe she should ask Prof. Merrill about her
presentation after all, but there’s a lineup to students in front of her
already, including the one weird guy – Jane can never remember his name –
who is always talking to Merrill about politics. Jane waits a few minutes and
then heads out the door.
It’s 2:15 PM. Jane drives home. Two of her roommates are watching TV and
smoking pot, which Jane has tried but doesn’t really like. They all sit and
talk for over an hour. One of her room-mates is thinking of getting back
together with her boyfriend. Another is failing most of her courses and is
thinking about not coming back next year and “just working instead” or “maybe
going to college for something.” Jane goes to her room. She opens her laptop
and checks her e-mail. There’s a message from her Human Sexuality professor,
who noticed that she didn’t hand in her critical analysis. Jane sends her an
e-mail saying that she had computer problems and promises to bring it by during
her office hours, tells the professor she is really enjoying the class and learning
a lot and that she hopes she won’t lose any marks.
Jane
has a wipe board above her bed. She has an essay due on Monday that she hasn’t
started. She needs to finish that Human Sexuality paper. Tomorrow she is
supposed to have read Henry IV, Part Two for her Shakespeare class, but
there are no discussions in that class so she doesn’t do the readings. She'll
get caught up before the midterm. Jane has a nap for half an hour then gets
ready for work. She decides to get Subway for dinner at the mall before her
shift. Later that evening, at work, she
gets a text from some friends. They’re going out to the bars. Did she want to
meet them after work? Jane thinks about it. Tomorrow’s her light day: just one
class and a tutorial. She’ll have plenty of time between them to get that Human
Sexuality assignment done and go to the library to get books for Prof. Jones's
essay. She says yes.
Jane’s
day, her Tuesday, is much like any day she’ll experience in university. Depending on the time of year, she spends no
more than fifteen or twenty hours per week on all aspects of her school-work:
attending class, reading, writing essays, and studying. If one were to take
into consideration the number of hours she spends in partial attention to the
matter at hand, the number of hours spent on actual schoolwork would be smaller
still. But her grades are usually decent
and sometimes a little better. She finishes courses with C’s and B’s by
producing work that, in a former age, would have been deemed utterly
unsatisfactory. If some bold educational reformer (or a coalition of taxpayers)
were really rigorously to test her, to demand that she write clearly, speak articulately,
and demonstrate mastery over what she has been taught, they would find that
Jane, mid-way through her 15th year of publicly-subsidized education, hasn’t read much (in fact, she dislikes
reading altogether), struggles to write clear sentences, gropes for vocabulary
when she speaks in class (which is not very often) and doesn’t remember much
about what she has been taught for very long. But her professors have learned,
through a generation of accumulated experience, not to expect too much, and
Jane rewards them by not demanding too much in return. She gets decent grades; professors
get good teaching evaluations; politicians get another finished product,
another tick on their vast statistical indices which prove that the system is
working. And, indeed, the assembly line is very efficient. It keeps moving Jane
and thousands of others like her along. Along the way they receive a small
cultural deposit before emerging to great fanfare at the all-important moment
of graduation.
So, there is Jane, thirty-four months later,
coming off the assembly line. She is at commencement, graduating with a major
in History and a minor in Sociology — she switched out of English after year
two. It’s a happy day, but there’s a
slight tightness in her chest when she thinks about what she’s going to do
next. She is twenty-one years old, and graduating with a B- average. She didn’t
get into teacher’s college but thinks that maybe she might do a 5th year — what
the students call a “Victory Lap” — to pull her marks up a bit, and then maybe
re-apply for teacher’s college or perhaps try to get into grad school and “do”
her Master’s Degree. Maybe Prof. Jones
would write her a letter of reference?
The principal, who Jane has never seen before,
gives a long and boring speech about how “proud the university community is of
its graduates”, how the graduates have “learned how to think and reason and
face the many challenges posed by the diverse and rapidly changing economy of
today”, but also about the threats to “spirit of higher education” and “the
essential mission of producing students who are ethical citizens.” Jane remembers that in first year she had a
philosophy lecture about the difference between morality and ethics. She can’t
remember what it was.
Her attention drifts as the principal drones on
and on. A phone rings. It belongs to
someone’s parent. The principal’s speech finally ends. A handful of students
involved in students’ council begin a standing ovation. Everyone follows. Jane
watches as a few of her friends cross the stage to get their degrees. She knows
that a few of them are coming back. Others are going to teacher’s college. Her
friend Rachel is going to teach English in South Korea. Rachel is graduating
with a C+ average.
Jane's name is called. She crosses the stage in
a rush, feeling very nervous. Professor Dearness, who Jane had for a course in
third year, hoods her and gives her a hug. Jane is handed her degree or,
rather, a paper representation of her degree. Her real one will arrive in the
mail three weeks later, after she has paid her library fines.
Meet Jane Doe, B.A. She has $44,000 in student debt, $7,000 more
on her credit cards, a BA in History and Sociology, and a job at the mall. Out
in the audience, Jane’s mother takes pictures and cries.
Labels:
Academic Matters,
Higher Education,
history,
lifestyle,
Reading,
satire,
Students,
Teaching
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
Earth
Passengers are reminded that killing one another, especially over matters of faith, is expressly prohibited. We ask that you be courteous to your fellow passengers at all times, even if they look different than you. A further reminder that all human passengers are born equal, regardless of sex or race, and that nonhuman species and should be treated respectfully as well. Local administrators are required to abide by these regulations.
For your comfort, food, shelter, and clothing are provided. First class passengers are encouraged to share with passengers in economy class.
Earth is pleased to offer a variety of recreational activities including art, literature, film, music, and sport, and encourages local administrators to extend public funding to such activities.
Employers are required to pay their employees decent wages and to provide safe working conditions. Employees should refrain from being smug, self-satisfied, passive-aggressive know-it-all jerks in department meetings.
Please do not play your headphones so loud that everyone else can hear your music, too. The same goes for music in your car or back yard. Avoid participating in sports-related rioting. Young human passengers are encouraged to keep their sticky fingers off of things that do not belong to them and to attempt to behave like rational people when in public. Teenagers are reminded that everything will work out okay and he/she wasn’t right for you anyway.
If you choose to procreate, please avoid taking babies to weddings, funerals, nice restaurants, the opera, theatre, or the movies.
Please do not date someone who has seen all of the Fast and Furious movies.
Passengers are asked to avoid texting while driving. In addition, do not text while on a date or while out with friends. Do not text when your teacher is talking to you. In fact, just put the goddamn phone away and have a look around because the world is pretty freaking fantastic if you’d bother to check it out for the six or seven seconds that you’ve reduced your attention span to. You’re the product of millions of years of accumulated adaptive advantages and this is what you do with your time? Why don’t you just move into your parents’ basement, learn Klingon, and play World of Warcraft for the rest of your life?
(Pause).
Ahem.
At this time, the flight crew would like to reiterate that persistent rumours of another world on standby after the completion of this trip are not verifiable and must therefore be treated with the utmost of suspicion. In consideration of other passengers, please desist from spreading such rumours.
For the comfort of your fellow passengers, a reminder that Earth is a smoke-free environment. For the convenience of passengers wishing to shorten the duration of their trip by approximately a decade, a smoking section is provided on the dark side of the moon.
Finally, would passengers Coulter, Ford, Palin, Putin, McCarthy, and O’Reilly please report to the shuttle bay for immediate deportation?
Thank you, and we hope you enjoy your flight on planet Earth.
Labels:
aging,
environment,
interfaith dialogue,
Morality and Ethics,
Reason,
religion,
satire,
Science
Sunday, March 16, 2014
Doom
Back in the day, I used to participate in message boards on AOL. We discussed history, politics, and whatnot. It was fun, you got to talk about your hobbies to people who actually cared, spar a bit over points of disagreement, and even occasionally become friends (or, indeed, enemies) of a sort with the other participants. Some list-serves – the kind that came to your e-mail box – followed. But my participation in such discussions fell off rapidly in graduate school, where there always seemed to be real people to argue with.
Nowadays, nearly every page on the Internet has a message board affixed to it, and some – like Facebook – are basically nothing but. Make no mistake: these boards do not exist in order to democratize the media or any of that nonsense. They exist to generate page views, information about viewership that can then be sold to potential advertisers. Over time, I found myself drawn to reading the comments in a "can’t look at it, can’t look away" sort of manner. Sometimes I even posted a comment of my own, and then felt like taking a shower afterwards. And so I decided to conduct an experiment. For about a year I partook in discussions on a variety of different pages. I posted, in all, six or seven hundred times (rarely more than twenty or thirty words at a time) and probably read ten times that number of posts. My intent: report my findings on Measure of Doubt when I eventually revived it.
I approached this with some rules. First, I’d use my real name, not a pseudonym. Second, I would never lie. Third, I would mainly respond by pointing out errors of fact and/or argumentative errors in the articles on which I was commenting and/or in the posts of others. Fourth, I would never resort to name calling or ad hominem of any kind. (Only once, near the end, did I break this rule. A poster suggested that he didn’t care if texting while driving endangered others – it’s a free country and he ought to be allowed to do it. I replied that we needn’t be worried in his case, as one needed friends in order to have anyone to send texts to in the first place. He replied, predictably, that he would be texting my mom. I said that, in that case, he ought to be careful, as texting on a flip-phone was hard enough, let alone while driving a late-model Datsun and when spelling isn’t your forte. Ding, ding, ding: and the winnah by knockout...) Fifth, I decided that my natural tone would be ironic. The Rob Ford business gave me both motive and opportunity to really sharpen these skills, which had grown quite dull and rusty sheathed in their scabbard since about 2005. Sixth, when participating in a discussion that lasted more than three exchanges back-and-forth (and on some boards, like CNN, the messages poured in so fast – literally dozens would arrive every second on big stories – that no “discussion” was possible at all) I would always thank my interlocutor for chatting, no matter how badly it went.
After a few months of participating on various boards, I reached certain conclusions, some of which I believe, and some of which (marked with an *) other people believe. Here they are, in order.
1) Humanity is doomed. I have no words to describe how totally, viciously, and horrifically boned we are as a species. My odds-on favourite for possible outcomes at the moment is some sort of global nuclear holocaust resulting from environmental catastrophe, followed by the total collapse of civilization. The survivors on the political right will turn to cannibalism and burn the contents of our libraries and museums in a forlorn attempt to stave off freezing to death in the nuclear winter. The survivors from the political left will say that civilization had it coming anyway and talk about the need for solidarity. Then they’ll get baked, try to (finally) make it past page five in Das Kapital, and plan for some sort of direct action tomorrow.
2) People are horrible. They are ill-informed, irrational, bigoted, tribal, tasteless, tactless, petty, self-interested, self-absorbed, and just plain mean. No part of the political spectrum has a monopoly on stupid; civility accrues nothing in your favour. My grandmother was right: people are garbage. Stay away from them.
3) No one works hard except for the person currently posting.* Everyone else is overpaid, underworked, and suckling at the bosom of the nanny state. Especially teachers. In addition, no one knows how to drive properly except for the person currently posting.
4) I have it on good authority that if it’s cold right now where you live, global warming is a hoax.
5) People who begin a sentence with a phrase such as “I’m not a racist, but...” are always racists. There are a lot of them.
6) Arguing with a Creationist about evolution is like arguing with a Big Mac about vegetarianism. Too. Far. Gone.
7) Bush is Hitler.*
8) Obama is also Hitler.*
9) Stephen Harper is worse than Hitler.*
10) The only political leader ever who is not Hitler is Hitler. Mention Hitler anywhere and hordes will rush to his defense.
11) But they’re “not racist.” They just want "white pride."*
12) Countries that aren’t the United States are permitted to kill, torture, and generally knock about pretty much anybody they want. Everybody gets a free pass because of what the United States did in Vietnam, to the natives, and because of slavery. Slow clap.*
13) Things used to be great. But now we have lost our values because of either a) immigrants or b) big corporations. Or both.*
14) Jesus is coming back soon. We’re not kidding this time.*
15) There is a cure for cancer, but they aren’t telling you what it is.*
16) There is also a cure for obesity, and the person posting knows what it is.*
17) Everything everywhere has been cured but they don’t want you to know.*
18) Educated people don’t know anything about the “real world.” They “can’t see the forest for the trees.”* People who make this argument often have difficulty distinguishing between “your” and “you’re” and “it’s” and “its”.
19) Misogyny is real. For proof, read the message boards on IMDB where they discuss Sex and the City and Girls.
20) The moderators of any particular message board are trying to silence at least one of the people currently posting, usually because the person they’re trying to silence is the only one exposing their lies.* Such statements are often accompanied by metaphors about emperors not having any clothes on.
21) Nobody hates Star Trek more than Star Trek fans. The principal holds true for obsessive fans of everything from other science fiction franchises to sports teams.
22) Except for Ayn Rand fans. Ayn Rand fans are the most rabidly indoctrinated sociopaths in recent history, with the possible exception of parents who rioted to get Cabbage Patch dolls for their children. They are probably the same people, I suspect.
24) Humanity is doomed. Mainly because of Ayn Rand fans.
Nowadays, nearly every page on the Internet has a message board affixed to it, and some – like Facebook – are basically nothing but. Make no mistake: these boards do not exist in order to democratize the media or any of that nonsense. They exist to generate page views, information about viewership that can then be sold to potential advertisers. Over time, I found myself drawn to reading the comments in a "can’t look at it, can’t look away" sort of manner. Sometimes I even posted a comment of my own, and then felt like taking a shower afterwards. And so I decided to conduct an experiment. For about a year I partook in discussions on a variety of different pages. I posted, in all, six or seven hundred times (rarely more than twenty or thirty words at a time) and probably read ten times that number of posts. My intent: report my findings on Measure of Doubt when I eventually revived it.
I approached this with some rules. First, I’d use my real name, not a pseudonym. Second, I would never lie. Third, I would mainly respond by pointing out errors of fact and/or argumentative errors in the articles on which I was commenting and/or in the posts of others. Fourth, I would never resort to name calling or ad hominem of any kind. (Only once, near the end, did I break this rule. A poster suggested that he didn’t care if texting while driving endangered others – it’s a free country and he ought to be allowed to do it. I replied that we needn’t be worried in his case, as one needed friends in order to have anyone to send texts to in the first place. He replied, predictably, that he would be texting my mom. I said that, in that case, he ought to be careful, as texting on a flip-phone was hard enough, let alone while driving a late-model Datsun and when spelling isn’t your forte. Ding, ding, ding: and the winnah by knockout...) Fifth, I decided that my natural tone would be ironic. The Rob Ford business gave me both motive and opportunity to really sharpen these skills, which had grown quite dull and rusty sheathed in their scabbard since about 2005. Sixth, when participating in a discussion that lasted more than three exchanges back-and-forth (and on some boards, like CNN, the messages poured in so fast – literally dozens would arrive every second on big stories – that no “discussion” was possible at all) I would always thank my interlocutor for chatting, no matter how badly it went.
After a few months of participating on various boards, I reached certain conclusions, some of which I believe, and some of which (marked with an *) other people believe. Here they are, in order.
1) Humanity is doomed. I have no words to describe how totally, viciously, and horrifically boned we are as a species. My odds-on favourite for possible outcomes at the moment is some sort of global nuclear holocaust resulting from environmental catastrophe, followed by the total collapse of civilization. The survivors on the political right will turn to cannibalism and burn the contents of our libraries and museums in a forlorn attempt to stave off freezing to death in the nuclear winter. The survivors from the political left will say that civilization had it coming anyway and talk about the need for solidarity. Then they’ll get baked, try to (finally) make it past page five in Das Kapital, and plan for some sort of direct action tomorrow.
2) People are horrible. They are ill-informed, irrational, bigoted, tribal, tasteless, tactless, petty, self-interested, self-absorbed, and just plain mean. No part of the political spectrum has a monopoly on stupid; civility accrues nothing in your favour. My grandmother was right: people are garbage. Stay away from them.
3) No one works hard except for the person currently posting.* Everyone else is overpaid, underworked, and suckling at the bosom of the nanny state. Especially teachers. In addition, no one knows how to drive properly except for the person currently posting.
4) I have it on good authority that if it’s cold right now where you live, global warming is a hoax.
5) People who begin a sentence with a phrase such as “I’m not a racist, but...” are always racists. There are a lot of them.
6) Arguing with a Creationist about evolution is like arguing with a Big Mac about vegetarianism. Too. Far. Gone.
7) Bush is Hitler.*
8) Obama is also Hitler.*
9) Stephen Harper is worse than Hitler.*
10) The only political leader ever who is not Hitler is Hitler. Mention Hitler anywhere and hordes will rush to his defense.
11) But they’re “not racist.” They just want "white pride."*
12) Countries that aren’t the United States are permitted to kill, torture, and generally knock about pretty much anybody they want. Everybody gets a free pass because of what the United States did in Vietnam, to the natives, and because of slavery. Slow clap.*
13) Things used to be great. But now we have lost our values because of either a) immigrants or b) big corporations. Or both.*
14) Jesus is coming back soon. We’re not kidding this time.*
15) There is a cure for cancer, but they aren’t telling you what it is.*
16) There is also a cure for obesity, and the person posting knows what it is.*
17) Everything everywhere has been cured but they don’t want you to know.*
18) Educated people don’t know anything about the “real world.” They “can’t see the forest for the trees.”* People who make this argument often have difficulty distinguishing between “your” and “you’re” and “it’s” and “its”.
19) Misogyny is real. For proof, read the message boards on IMDB where they discuss Sex and the City and Girls.
20) The moderators of any particular message board are trying to silence at least one of the people currently posting, usually because the person they’re trying to silence is the only one exposing their lies.* Such statements are often accompanied by metaphors about emperors not having any clothes on.
21) Nobody hates Star Trek more than Star Trek fans. The principal holds true for obsessive fans of everything from other science fiction franchises to sports teams.
22) Except for Ayn Rand fans. Ayn Rand fans are the most rabidly indoctrinated sociopaths in recent history, with the possible exception of parents who rioted to get Cabbage Patch dolls for their children. They are probably the same people, I suspect.
24) Humanity is doomed. Mainly because of Ayn Rand fans.
Sunday, March 2, 2014
Hockey
Your noble author contains multitudes, faithful readers, and so it came to pass that on the 23rd day of February in the Year of Lord 2014, he rose at his customary hour on Sunday, fed the felines, made coffee, and turned on the computer. Heedless of the peril that he might start drinking Coors Light, calling other males “man” “bro” and “buddy” and giving them suspiciously long hugs punctuated by thumping yet strangely tender pats on the back, he watched the Olympic Gold Medal hockey game. It was the first hockey game he had ever watched from one end to the other. In commemoration of this momentous and never-to-be repeated event, he took notes on his reactions to the extraordinary spectacle of watching millionaires skate around for an hour. Well, half of them are millionaires. He isn’t so sure about the Swedes. Below is the unedited transcript:
===
7 AM. Coffee in hand (done right, in a French press); cats are momentarily content. Computer is on. I am one of 4 million people live-streaming this on CBC.ca. Don Cherry, who ranked 8th on the list of Greatest Canadians a decade ago, is screaming at me. To quell the noise and incoherence I contemplate banging some pots and pans together while shrieking like Yoko Ono but the moment passes.
7:07 AM. They are playing. There is much analysis going on between the CBC Broadcasters. The Canadians need to play a tight defense. And a tight offense. I am a hockey neophyte and have trouble keeping up with their strategizing.
7:07:28. Swedish player goes off the ice after less than thirty seconds. This must be some kind of hockey rule or something.
7:15 AM or thereabouts. Canadians score. I miss this as I was reboiling the kettle for more coffee (I have a problem, I admit.) CBC broadcasts crowds of Canadians in various places across the country, cheering like mad. The shots look staged, or at least highly performative. They do not replay the goal.
7:18. People are skating.
7:21 AM. Occurs to me that nobody is racist about Swedes.
7:22 AM. I minimize the viewer to the corner and check e-mail. Send a couple of replies to the usual morning dross. (“Dear Professor, I have been very sick and my dog died and my grandmother has been diagnosed with certain death and my girlfriend left me for Bill Clinton. Can I please get an extension on the essay that was due last month?”)
7:23 AM. I look at bicycles. Surly Long Haul Trucker or the venerable Trek 520? Do I want a Rohloff hub for my touring bike? Good for 100,000 KM they say.
7:26 AM. Paying more attention to the game for a bit. Men are skating around. Looking at the uniforms, I keep thinking “stop if you can” and “stop”.
7:27 AM. Intermission. This is called the “end of first period.” Ah.
7:28 AM. More Don Cherry. Shouting. Intolerable. Didn’t he support Rob Ford? Say something about pinkos on bicycles, too? Strange: as I understand it cycling is a core component of off-season training for many hockey players.
7:35 AM. Don Cherry says to Canadian kids that if they work hard they too can end up NHL players, just like their heroes. I check. There are 5.6 million Canadians under the age of 14. There are 488 Canadians in the NHL. Assuming the same percentages: you’ve got one shot in 125,000. So stop readin’ books you sissies and get out there and skate.
I lose track of time.
Second “period” begins. Men skate around. At one point, a bunch of them gather by the boards and there’s this cluster trying to get the puck. They hack at it like a bunch of guys trying to chop up a gopher emerging from a hole. Best metaphor I had for this.
Skating.
Minimized viewer again. It plays in the corner while I surf the web. Twitter. Hilary Clinton’s tweet feed identifies her as “Wife, mother, U.S. Senator” in that order. They had a focus group for that, you know. They did - guaranteed. They had focus groups and ran small polls to determine the best order in which to put that. Senator, mom, wife? Wife, Senator, mom? Gotta please the family values types…
Hockey. People are skating. Icing call. I picture my mother calling me to the kitchen to lick the spatula when she’s finished a cake. Icing call.
Skating. I Facebook. A friend notes that Ikea doesn’t sell hockey sticks. Ten minutes too late I reply that hockey sticks are hard to assemble with an Allen key.
Penalty against a Canadian. Occurs to me that there are slight advantages to getting a penalty: you get to rest for a couple of minutes, and you have an awesome seat for the game.
Skating. Am joined by Amanda. Tea and more coffee.
Canadians score another. I feel mildly elated but am reminded of the immortal words of Han Solo: “Don’t get cocky, kid.” Always good advice.
Carey Price probably got made fun of in school for his name. Those people are sorry now, because they’re watching him play. And drinking Coors Light before 8 AM.
Is it checking or chequing? Which way do we spell it in Canada?
16:08 in second period. Champlain founded Quebec that year.
Skating.
Skating.
Whistles.
Some chequing.
Why is there no fighting? Is this hockey not as good because it doesn’t have fighting? If I were a hockey player, I would use reasoned argument to solve problems on the ice. “Sorry about that ill-timed cheque, kind sir. It was my fault entirely. Can we discuss how to avoid such incidents in the future? Again, my most sincere apologies.”
Second period ends. Swedes are down by two. More analysis. Hockey analyst guy is very incisive. Actual quotation: “Swedes need to play a tough offensive game now. When you’re down by two, you can’t lay back and be defensive.” I find this very helpful. I would have thought that when you’re losing by two goals the key would have been defensive play. Forgive me, I am new to the game.
Third period.
Skating. Skating. Skating. Play-by-play announcers could be making up names for all I know.
Puck goes over the glass. Do they show a fan catching it, holding it up in the air? No. Odd.
Skating.
I check Sweden’s population. Just under 10 million. Could we take them in a war? Hard to say. They had conscription until recently. I consider how much I would have hated military life. Orders. Conformity. Shouting. Large groups of aggressive men. Green. I would have used reason argument with my senior drill instruction. “Sarge, I don’t respond well to the shouting. Maybe we could discuss this over coffee?”
Skating. I notice on Wikipedia that most Swedish military kit is home grown. How can they afford the R & D for such small procurement numbers? I need to look this up.
I like Saab automobiles. I had a Saab ball cap when I was a teenager. I wore it everywhere. It was part of my identity. Weird: I don’t drive.
Skating.
When I was ten or eleven my parents sent me to a sports day camp for two weeks. The people who ran it were awful: mean, slovenly, foul-mouthed. And I was not good at sports, which pretty much was the equivalent of a tattoo on my forehead that said “please beat me up”, which the other boys did with enthusiasm, and the beatings were usually accompanied by all manner of homophobic epithets. Sports build character. It did in my case. I learned that coping with being bullied is an important life skill. Certainly it has been one of the keys to success in my chosen profession.
Skating.
Skating.
Oh my god.
Skating.
Skating.
I check the news from Syria, which nobody seems to care about anymore. Many dead. Upheaval. Also, Canada’s Senate scandal seems to have blown over. But Harper got a case of beer from Obama. Sam Adams. Not a bad choice.
I begin to make breakfast. Tex-Mex breakfast burritos.
Skating. Whistles. Canada gets a third goal. I feel bad for the Swedes now. They are nice and have a fine social welfare system. And Ikea. And write good crime novels. I thought Kenneth Branagh was good in the BBC version of Wallander. I check IMDB to see if it’s coming back for more. It is. Awesomeness. But so is Heroes. Why?
Skating. Whistles. Swedes look sad. I feel bad for them. Is their king watching? I look up the king of Sweden, guess his name is either “Carl” or “Gustaf”. Holy crap: he’s Carl Gustaf. There’s a picture of him. He’s an Honorary Admiral in the British Royal Navy. Weird. He also is a Knight with Collar of the Order of the Elephant in Denmark. This I have to check on Wikipedia. It’s the highest order in Denmark. Nothing to do with actual elephants, which are not native to Denmark.
I watch hockey. Amanda is reading about Ukraine. This will end badly.
Skating. Three minutes remain.
Breakfast is about ready. Eggs got a bit browned on the bottom. We fold them into wraps with onions, mushrooms, peppers, avocado, and goat cheese. I wonder again if I could or should be vegetarian. Probably yes to both.
Skating. Countdown. Ten, nine, etc.
Canada wins. I feel a tiny twinge of national pride. And also that this is vengeance for all the poorly drilled holes and missing pieces from Ikea furniture over the years.
Mentally, I cross “watch a hockey game” off my bucket list. It comes just below “write a bucket list” and just above “get a colonoscopy”.
Much cheering across Canada on CBC. Looks staged again. In Russia, the players shake hands. Some replays. I see Sidney Crosby remove his helmet. I was hoping for female and flowing red hair, like Eowyn in Lord of the Rings when she reveals herself. “I am NO man!” That would have been awesome.
Am pretty sure I see a Canadian player mouth, “Fuck, yeah.” Camera moves away from him rather quickly.
According to CBC, 15 million watched the game. I check: 13 million voted in the last federal election. Apples and oranges? I dunno. I’m just sayin’
Thursday, December 26, 2013
Surrender
“And the day after Christmas, the whole family gathered into the SUV and drove to the big box plaza, which was FAR, FAR away from the core of the city where nasty hipsters and EVEN people needing social assistance lived. Then they returned all the crap they didn’t want and snapped up things they did at bargain prices! And ran their credit card balances UP and UP and UP! The end.” For immediate release:
The War on Christmas, one of the least effective military campaigns in the history of the world, has been lost. Anti-Christmas forces, having been reduced to a handful of deviants muttering something about the winter solstice and Jesus not having been born on the 25th of December, surrendered unconditionally, their efforts having been proven futile for the 50th year in a row.
Once again this year, the Christmas season returned on November 1st (some localities waited until November 12th out of respect for those who gave their lives in the early battles to save Christmas) and stayed for its customary seven weeks. During this period, multicoloured lights appeared on trees and rooftops everywhere, alongside the visage of the Great Leader – who, you will recall, has children under perpetual surveillance to ensure their compliance with behavioural norms – and variations on the same dozen songs played incessantly from speakers in every public place in the Western hemisphere. A minority even went to “church”, but most, as is the custom of the past half-century, went to shopping malls and spent themselves into oblivion, despite the cluck-clucking from a handful of Christian conservatives, who represent the last bastion of anti-capitalist thought in our society. Meanwhile, televisions bombarded revelers with hours of familiar but repetitious entertainment, including Rudolf the Red Nosed Reindeer, The Charlie Brown Christmas, The Grinch Who Stole Christmas, and of course the annual mawkish, maudlin, mediocre and incomprehensible Dr. Who Christmas Special. As usual, the North American Aerospace Defense Command issued reports of the Dear Leader’s progress across the Northern Hemisphere on Christmas Eve, part of an ongoing disinformation campaign. On the day itself, "families" (groups of people associated on a biological basis but barely known to one another) gathered for stressful meals where they outwardly cooed over how very good everything tasted, but inwardly reflected that pretty much everything was overcooked and cold by the time everybody sat down to eat.
In other news, on a local street corner, one of the few surviving anti-Christmas cranks was heard to say, “Political correctness has run amok. You used to be able to say 'Happy Holidays' and 'Seasons Greetings' to people without anybody getting offended. Now, if you don’t go around saying “Merry Christmas” they jump all over you." He has been evacuated to a nearby Toys ‘r’ Us where he will be required to listen to “Simply Having a Wonderful Christmastime” over and over until he is fit to rejoin society.
-30-
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







